Close

Grow Houses

Florida has more indoor marijuana grow houses than anywhere else in the country, according to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. Operations have been detected in almost every Florida county over the last several years. Over the last 10 years, authorities have seized millions of marijuana plants valued at billions of dollars, and more than 10,000 people have been arrested on related charges.

While cultivation of marijuana is generally a third-degree felony, operating a grow house for purposes of selling the plant is considered trafficking, and a conviction may result in up to 30 years in prison, depending on the size of the operation.

The Fort Lauderdale marijuana defense lawyers at The Ansara Law Firm, understand the seriousness of such allegations. We also know there are a number of workable defenses for the accused.

These defenses include:

  • Illegal/Warrantless Search and Seizure
  • Absence of Probable Cause to Obtain Warrant
  • Coercive “Knock-and-Talk”
  • Invalid Consent to Search
  • Exceeding the Scope of Consensual Search
  • Overly-Broad Protective Sweep
  • Miranda Violations
  • Right to Counsel Violations
  • Controlled Substances Not in Plain View

Each of these defenses is available under the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable search and seizure. These are some of the most effective defenses in terms of having evidence suppressed or charges dismissed in a Florida grow house case. Still, there are a myriad of other defenses potentially available under other statutory provisions. The exact strategy will depend on the individual circumstances of the case.

Marijuana Grow House Eradication Act

One of the most essential tools prosecutors have in marijuana grow house cases is the 2008 Marijuana Grow House Eradication Act, signed amid an increasing number of these operations cropping up around the state.

Lawmakers increased the threshold for marijuana grow houses, making it a second-degree felony to grow 25 or more plants. The previous number was 300. A second-degree felony carries a possible maximum prison sentence of 15 years.

The law also made it a third-degree felony (punishable by up to five years in prison) to own, rent or lease a home for the purpose of growing, packaging or distributing cannabis, and a first-degree felony for growing more than 25 plants in a home with children present.

The law is codified in F.S. 893.1351, and is applicable to:

  • Landlords
  • Residents
  • Renters
  • Visitors (if they exercise any control over the operation)

The law further allows law enforcement to:

  • Use photo/video evidence (as opposed to retaining the actual equipment/plants) in prosecution
  • Destroy all equipment upon the completion of investigations
  • Have immunity from civil liability for destruction of equipment seized from a grow house

Before this law was passed, prosecutors were hard-pressed to get long prison terms for people caught growing dozens of plants. That’s no longer an issue.

What’s more, if a person is charged with trafficking in cannabis, it is considered a first-degree felony, which carries a minimum mandatory three-year prison term, with the possibility of a 30-year term. In order to be charged with trafficking – the most serious of these charges – there must be at least 300 plants involved.

One might seek to avoid the most serious of these penalties by asserting the purpose of growing the plant was not for distribution or sale. In order to prove this, one needs to show the cannabis was intended for personal consumption and/or medicinal purposes. Although there is, as of yet, no legally acceptable reason to grow marijuana in Florida, it is considered less of an offense to grow it for one’s own use than to grow it for profit.

Detecting Grow House Operations

While police rely heavily on insider information in these cases, one of the other biggest red flags is electricity.

Law enforcement officials are well aware of the fact marijuana grow operations require two to three times as much electricity as the average residence. Some growers bypass this attention by stealing the energy from other sources. However, because residential grids aren’t often equipped to manage the high amount of power needed for these operations, fires often occur and can lead to arrest following an investigation by fire officials.

Another possible indication is the smell, which is often quite powerful. However, smell alone is not a strong enough basis to grant a warrant, courts have ruled.

Some other good news for defendants: Since 2001, with the U.S. Supreme Court case of Kyllo v. United States, law enforcement is not allowed to use thermal imaging devices in their investigations into suspected grow house operations.

Prior to the Kyllo ruling, this was a primary tactic employed by investigators in these cases, as heat from high-intensity lamps often used by growers is considered a key tip-off. The U.S. Supreme Court, however, determined the use of these sorts of devices – not in general public use – to probe into private homes to learn information that would not otherwise be obtainable without physically entering – is a presumptively unreasonable search, unless there is a warrant.

Officers do, however, have their ways around this requirement. They may seek an informant. They may stake out a property, waiting patiently for a car carrying the cannabis to leave before stopping that vehicle on a minor traffic violation. They will knock on the door, ask to talk to the residents and push for a confession.

We generally advise people faced with law enforcement presence to decline a search without a warrant and decline a discussion with police absent an experienced Fort Lauderdale defense attorney. Knowing these basic rights can help preserve your future.

Contact the experienced Fort Lauderdale criminal defense lawyers at The Ansara Law Firm, by calling (954) 761-4011 or toll-free at (954) 761-4011.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
“Just wanted to say what a professional law firm "The Ansara Law Firm" was in handling my case and can't thank Richard enough for keeping me calm and letting me know the status of my case. You really do care about your clients and made me feel at ease during my legal issues!” Andy Austin
★★★★★
"Richard was thorough, patient and went above and beyond to make a hard time for my family a little more bearable. I pray we never need a criminal defense attorney again, but if we do, there is NO doubt who we're going to!" Amy
★★★★★
"I had a dui case and Mr. Ansara made it go as smooth as possible. He was able to time everything so I could get a new company up and running without the dui effecting my ability to drive." Sean
★★★★★
"I have been a client of Richard Ansara for several years now, I am pleased with his outcomes on all my cases, patience, professionalism and courteousness when I come into his office. I would definitely recommend Ansara's Law Firm to friends and family for any of their future legal needs." Emily Gutierrez
Contact Us